By Louis Althusser, Etienne Balibar, Roger Establet, Jacques Ranciere, Pierre Macherey
A vintage paintings of Marxist research, to be had unabridged for the 1st time
Originally released in 1965, Reading Capital is a landmark of French proposal and radical idea, reconstructing Western Marxism from its foundations. Louis Althusser, the French Marxist thinker, maintained that Marx’s venture may purely be revived if its medical and progressive novelty was once completely divested of all lines of humanism, idealism, Hegelianism and historicism. so that it will entire this serious rereading, Althusser and his scholars on the École normale supérieure ran a seminar on Capital, re-examining its arguments, strengths and weaknesses intimately, and it used to be out of these discussions that this e-book used to be born.
formerly merely to be had in English in hugely abridged shape, this variation, showing fifty years after its unique booklet in France, restores chapters by way of Roger Establet, Pierre Macherey and Jacques Rancière. It incorporates a significant new creation via Étienne Balibar.
Read Online or Download Reading Capital: The Complete Edition PDF
Best communism & socialism books
Socialism Unbound, through Stephen Bronner, used to be largely acclaimed while it first seemed in 1990. This moment revised version brings it brand new. Written in a transparent prose, and an uncompromising demeanour, it deals new serious reflections at the culture of operating category politics and its salience for the recent millennium.
During this excellent paintings, first released in 1936, Sydney Hook seeks to unravel one of many vintage difficulties of ecu highbrow historical past: how the political radicalism and philosophical materialism of Karl Marx issued from the paranormal and conservative highbrow procedure of G. W. F. Hegel. This version features a ahead via Christopher Phelps discussing Hook's profession and the importance of From Hegel to Marx within the background of rules.
“This e-book is exceptional, incisive, sincere and merits to be learn with recognition. it truly is a big occasion within the Marxist theoretical creation. ” —Politique Hebdo“A outstanding essay, whose benefit isn't just theoretical, but additionally ancient, since it examines unknown features of the evolution of younger Marx’s considering.
This booklet rejects the generally encountered notion of Friedrich Engels as perpetuator of a "tragic deception" of Marx, and the both power physique of opinion treating him as "his master's voice". Engels's declare to attractiveness is strengthened by way of an outstanding contribution within the 1840s to the very foundations of the Marxian company, a contribution entailing not just the "vision" yet a number of the construction blocks within the understanding of that imaginative and prescient.
- Conquest of America: How the Indian Nations Lost Their Continent (Cornerstone Books)
- East German Dissidents and the Revolution of 1989: Social Movement in a Leninist Regime
- Free Radical: New Century Essays
- Interpreting Thomas More's ''Utopia''
Additional resources for Reading Capital: The Complete Edition
I cannot deal with the least of these conclusions here, but they are easily developed, particularly where they involve the structure of the visible and the invisible, a foretaste of whose importance can be detected here. , his ideological arguments and concepts. I only want to insist on one particular point: the play on words on which this conception is based and which involves the concept ‘real’. In fact, it is possible to give a first characterization of this empiricist conception of knowledge as a play on the word ‘real’.
I am alluding precisely to what the history of ideological philosophy classifies as the ‘problem of knowledge’ or ‘theory of knowledge’. I say ideological philosophy since it is this ideological posing of the ‘problem of knowledge’ which defines the tradition that coincides with Western idealist philosophy (from Descartes to Husserl, via Kant and Hegel). , not as a real problem but as the problem that had to be posed if the desired ideological solution was to be the solution to this problem. I cannot deal here with this point which defines the essentials of ideology, in its ideological form, and which in principle reduces ideological knowledge (and par excellence the knowledge which ideology is discussing when it reflects knowledge in the form of the problem of knowledge or the theory of knowledge) to a phenomenon of recognition.
The progressive and systematic production of a reflection of the problematic on its objects such as to make them visible, and the illumination, the production of the deepestlying problematic which will allow us to see what could otherwise only have existed allusively or practically. As a function of this demand, I can claim to have read the specific theoretical form of the Marxist dialectic in its directly political existence (and actively political: the policies of a revolutionary leader – Lenin – immersed in the revolution); as a function of this principle, I can claim to have treated Mao Zedong’s 1937 text on contradiction as a description of the structures of the Marxist dialectic reflected in political practice.