Download Is There a God of Human Rights? The Complex Relationship by Johannes Van der ven;Jaco S. Dreyer;Hendrik J. C. Pieterse PDF

By Johannes Van der ven;Jaco S. Dreyer;Hendrik J. C. Pieterse

This quantity offers with ancient, systematic and empirical questions with reference to the complicated dating among human rights and faith. It makes a speciality of where and serve as of human rights in democracies in sleek society. in addition it elaborates at the difficulties that are implied within the complicated dating among human rights and faith from the start. finally it investigates the optimistic, detrimental and ambivalent empirical results of spiritual attitudes on human rights attitudes between a few formative years in South Africa. Readership : All these drawn to human rights and faith, specifically students and scholars in human rights legislation, legislations and faith, spiritual stories.

Show description

Read Online or Download Is There a God of Human Rights? The Complex Relationship Between Human Rights and Religion, a South African... PDF

Best religion books

Divine Fury: A History of Genius

Genius. The notice connotes a nearly unworldly strength: the facility to create, to understand common secrets and techniques, even to wreck. As popular highbrow historian Darrin McMahon explains in Divine Fury, the concept that of genius may be traced again to antiquity, whilst males of serious perception have been regarded as recommended by way of demons.

Intersections of Gender, Religion and Ethnicity in the Middle Ages (Genders and Sexualities in History)

This selection of essays focuses consciousness on how medieval gender intersects with different different types of distinction, fairly faith and ethnicity. It treats the interval c. 800-1500, with a selected specialise in the period of the Gregorian reform stream, the 1st campaign, and its associated assaults on Jews at domestic.

Extra info for Is There a God of Human Rights? The Complex Relationship Between Human Rights and Religion, a South African...

Sample text

We are able to understand, explain, sum up, augment and correct the way we understand ourselves through our understanding of the the social constitution 23 other. The extraordinary thing is that the other, too, can make her own speech an object, thus enabling her to understand both us and herself via our understanding. This represents the acme of what we might call human self-consciousness. It is not a monologic phenomenon, as though people are directly conscious of themselves and are directly present to themselves, as is argued in what is known as idealistic philosophy of consciousness, but a dialogic phenomenon, because being is founded in the social process of human communication: self-consciousness is essentially inter-subjective.

The underlying idea is often that when retribution is effected between individuals and/or groups the imbalance is cancelled out, relations are restored, equilibrium is re-established, and the parties can once more deal with each other in a manner conforming to the situation before the offence was committed. Even the idea of possible forgiveness is mooted. From all this it may be inferred that the principle of retribution is fundamentally about respect for life and the preservation of life. Note that at this stage the anthropological research data do not permit us to consider the principle of retribution a universal principle, but only an extremely widespread cross-cultural phenomenon (Renteln 1990, 88–137).

He was a moderate liberal and a defender of the modern constitutional state (Rawls 2000, 352–353). the social constitution 19 identity (Hegel 1988, 127–132). In other words, the constitution of the human being is not individualistic nor autarkic but social, being based on the dialectic of mutual recognition of identity and difference. To think that this is a kind of ideal image, remote from physical reality, that can only originate in the mind of a speculative philosopher is a mistake. To add cogency to his idea Hegel gives an incisive analysis of the master-servant relationship, which, in its asymmetry, appears to be a negation of his insight into the meaning of mutual recognition.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.98 of 5 – based on 24 votes