By Lowell Edmunds
How will we clarify the method in which a literary textual content refers to a different textual content? For the prior decade and a part, intertextuality has been a relevant obstacle of students and readers of Roman poetry. In Intertextuality and the interpreting of Roman Poetry, Lowell Edmunds proceeds from such basic ideas as "author," "text," and "reader," which he then applies to passages from Vergil, Horace, Ovid, and Catullus. Edmunds combines shut readings of poems with research of modern theoretical types to argue that allusion has no linguistic or semiotic foundation: there's not anything in addition to the alluding phrases that reasons the allusion or the connection with be made. Intertextuality is an issue of reading.
Read Online or Download Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry PDF
Similar medieval books
This concise and energetic survey introduces scholars with out past wisdom to Chaucer, and especially to the 'Canterbury Tales'. Written in an invitingly inclusive but intellectually refined type, it presents crucial evidence concerning the poet, together with a biography and comic strip of his significant works, in addition to providing a framework for pondering creatively approximately his writing.
All of us be ready to realize and create humour, yet how precisely can we do it? Salvatore Attardo and Victor Raskin have tried to give an explanation for the workings of humour with their basic thought of Verbal Humor (1991). The primary target of Hamilton's research is to check the usefulness of the overall conception of Verbal Humor on a particular corpus through deciding upon and reading the narrative buildings that create humour.
3 historical battles, from the arriving of the Vikings in early Britain to the Norman invasion, are informed in picture novel structure: In 793, the sacking of Lindisfarne is the 1st Viking raid on Britain; At Ediginton, Alfred the nice defends the dominion of Wessex from Vikings in 878; In 1066, English forces, exhausted from struggling with the Vikings, face
- Die Ritter und Ritterorden
- Toni Morrison and the Classical Tradition: Transforming American Culture
- Women and Disability in Medieval Literature
- Sound, Sense, and Rhythm: Listening to Greek and Latin Poetry
- Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Senecan Tragedy: Scholarly, Theatrical and Literary Receptions
Additional resources for Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry
93), an example of damaging, if not exactly parodistic, retroactive intertextuality, is discussed in Chapter 8. Authorial intention as a critical principle has also been argued for in another way, different from Hirsch’s, which I have called external. ’’≤≤ If language consists of speech acts, a fortiori poems and literary works in general are speech acts, and this premise then soon becomes a conclusion. Knapp and Michaels want to illustrate their concept of intention with the example of a poem (Wordsworth’s ‘‘A slumber did my spirit seal’’) traced on the seashore by a receding wave.
Conte 1986: 42–44; cf. 56–57. 9 (Vides ut alta stet nive candidum / Soracte). This ode begins by establishing what Pasquali called a ‘‘motto,’’ with a citation of Alcaeus. Indeed, the sympotic scene at the beginning of the ode is modeled on a poem of Alcaeus (338 Lobel and Page) and employs the same stanza, called ‘‘Alcaic,’’ as that poem. Now within this scene, the speaker proposes to a certain Thaliarchus that he pour out wine from a Sabine jar. The word for jar is diota, emphatic in its climactic position at the end of the second stanza.
Text 9 this way, intertextuality assumes the function of a critical concept. ≥≥ In place of the work, she presents the text. ≥∂ For the understanding of Kristeva’s model of intertextuality, her critical, Marxist orientation is of the greatest importance. ≥∑ At the same time, Kristeva’s theory presents literary studies with the challenge of understanding the nonliterary or nonpoetic, synchronic intertextual dimension of texts. ≥∏ He speaks of the ‘‘cardinal and privileged role of memory within poetry,’’ a notion that seems to exclude or override any contemporary literary strands of the textual network.